设计学研究议题动向分析&#x02014;&#x02014;以《设计问题》的文献计量学研究为例

李敏敏; 刘娟娟

doi:10.19798/j.cnki.2096-6946.2025.04.013

PDF(786 KB)

工业工程设计 ›› 2025, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4) : 99-106. DOI: 10.19798/j.cnki.2096-6946.2025.04.013

国家社科基金艺术学重点项目推介（专题主编李敏敏）

设计学研究议题动向分析——以《设计问题》的文献计量学研究为例

李敏敏^*, 刘娟娟

作者信息 +

Analysis of Trends in Design Research Topics: A Bibliometric Study of Design Issues

LI Minmin^*, LIU Juanjuan

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

作为美国第一本涵盖设计史、设计理论和设计批评的设计研究杂志,《设计问题》Design Issues自创刊以来就以推动设计学学科建设与发展为宗旨,致力于为设计学研究提供专业的学术交流平台。在此采用文献计量学方法,借助CiteSpace软件,对《设计问题》期刊的关键词、高产作者和高被引文献进行可视化分析,并将设计学研究议题动向归纳为三个方面：对设计理论边界的拓展;对设计研究范式的重构;对跨学科协作的倡议。

Abstract

As the first American design research journal covering design history, theory, and criticism, Design Issues has been committed to advancing the discipline and development of design studies since its inception, providing a professional academic platform for design research. The bibliometric methods and CiteSpace software are employed to conduct a visual analysis of key words, prolific authors, and highly cited literature in Design Issues. The trends in design research topics are summarized into three aspects: the expansion of design theory boundaries, the reconstruction of design research paradigms, and the advocacy for interdisciplinary collaboration.

导出引用

李敏敏, 刘娟娟. 设计学研究议题动向分析——以《设计问题》的文献计量学研究为例[J]. 工业工程设计. 2025, 7(4): 99-106 https://doi.org/10.19798/j.cnki.2096-6946.2025.04.013

LI Minmin, LIU Juanjuan. Analysis of Trends in Design Research Topics: A Bibliometric Study of Design Issues[J]. Industrial & Engineering Design. 2025, 7(4): 99-106 https://doi.org/10.19798/j.cnki.2096-6946.2025.04.013

中图分类号： J0

参考文献

[1] MARGOLIN V.Design in History[J]. Design Issues,2009,25(2):94-105.
[2] BROWN B,BUCHANAN R,DISALVO C,et al.Introduction[J]. Design Issues,2020,36(4):1-4.
[3] MIT Press.MIT Press Direct[EB/OL]. (2025-04-19)[2025-04-23]. https://direct.mit.edu/desi.
[4] CHEN C M.Science Mapping:A Systematic Review of the Literature[J]. Journal of Data and Information Science,2017,2(2):1-40.
[5] LEYDESDORFF L,RAFOLS I.A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2009,60(2):348-362.
[6] SMALL H.Co-Citation in the Scientific Literature:A New Measure of the Relationship between Two Documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1973,24(4):265-269.
[7] CHEN C M.CiteSpace II:Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2006,57(3):359-377.
[8] WALTMAN L,VAN ECK N J,NOYONS E C M. A Unified Approach to Mapping and Clustering of Bibliometric Networks[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(4):629-635.
[9] BECKETT S J.The Logic of the Design Problem:A Dialectical Approach[J]. Design Issues,2017,33(4):5-16.
[10] ÅMAN P,ANDERSSON H,HOBDAY M.The Scope of Design Knowledge:Integrating the Technically Rational and Human-Centered Dimensions[J]. Design Issues,2017,33(2):58-69.
[11] HOLROYD A T.From Stitch to Society:A Multi-Level and Participatory Approach to Design Research[J]. Design Issues,2017,33(3):11-24.
[12] NIMKULRAT N,MATTHEWS J.Ways of Being Strands:Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration Using Craft and Mathematics[J]. Design Issues,2017,33(4):59-72.
[13] BJÖGVINSSON E,EHN P,HILLGREN P A. Design Things and Design Thinking:Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges[J]. Design Issues,2012,28(3):101-116.
[14] FREDIANI A A. re-Imagining Participatory Design:Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology[J]. Design Issues,2016,32(3):98-111.
[15] LAKE D,WHIPPS J.Feminist Pragmatist Design:Evolutionary Systems Change[J]. Design Issues,2023,39(4):21-34.
[16] KOSKINEN I. Agonistic,Convivial,andConceptual Aesthetics in New Social Design[J]. Design Issues,2016,32(3):18-29.
[17] YU E.Toward an Integrative Service Design Framework and Future Agendas[J]. Design Issues,2020,36(2):41-57.
[18] CASSIM F.Design Activism in South Africa:Design Interventions as Invented Spaces to Encourage Activist Citizenship[J]. Design Issues,2024,40(1):4-14.
[19] CROSBY A.Design Activism in an Indonesian Village[J]. Design Issues,2019,35(3):50-63.
[20] AITAMURTO T,HOLLAND D,HUSSAIN S.The Open Paradigm in Design Research[J]. Design Issues,2015,31(4):17-29.
[21] NUSEM E,WRIGLEY C,MATTHEWS J.Developing Design Capability in Nonprofit Organizations[J]. Design Issues,2017,33(1):61-75.
[22] PUCILLO F,BECATTINI N,CASCINI G.A UX Model for the Communication of Experience Affordances[J]. Design Issues,2016,32(2):3-18.
[23] DIXON B,KASZYNSKA P.Design and Making Things Better:Relating the Pragmatism of John Dewey and Richard McKeon in Design Inquiry[J]. Design Issues,2024,40(4):29-38.
[24] HIRSCH T.Surreptitious Communication Design[J]. Design Issues,2016,32(2):64-77.
[25] DILEK Ö,KAYA C.A Promising Break in the “Black Box”:Agency of Competencies and Interpretation in Istanbul Maker Ecologies[J]. Design Issues,2023,39(3):45-59.
[26] GALLE P.Foundational and Instrumental Design Theory[J]. Design Issues,2011,27(4):81-94.
[27] DONNELLY B.The Emergence of Chinese-Influenced Design as an International Automotive Design Language[J]. Design Issues,2020,36(1):77-87.
[28] TSUI C.The Design Theory of Contemporary “Chinese” Fashion[J]. Design Issues,2019,35(3):64-75.
[29] NUSEM E,MATTHEWS J,WRIGLEY C.Toward Design Orientation and Integration:Driving Design from Awareness to Action[J]. Design Issues,2019,35(3):35-49.
[30] MAGALHAES R.Design Discourse for Organization Design:Foundations in Human-Centered Design[J]. Design Issues,2018,34(3):6-16.
[31] NORMAN D A,VERGANTI R.Incremental and Radical Innovation:Design Research Vs. Technology and Meaning Change[J]. Design Issues,2014,30(1):78-96.
[32] KOLKO J.Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking:The Drivers of Design Synthesis[J]. Design Issues,2010,26(1):15-28.
[33] ROBERTSON T,SIMONSEN J.Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Participatory Design[J]. Design Issues,2012,28(3):3-9.
[34] STEEN M.Co-Design as a Process of Joint Inquiry and Imagination[J]. Design Issues,2013,29(2):16-28.
[35] TROMP N,HEKKERT P,VERBEEK P P.Design for Socially Responsible Behavior:A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience[J]. Design Issues,2011,27(3):3-19.
[36] MANZINI E.Making Things Happen:Social Innovation and Design[J]. Design Issues,2014,30(1):57-66.
[37] DILNOT C,SANCHEZ-MORENO L.John Heskett’s Industrial Design:An Interview at Middlesex Polytechnic,1981:Part One:Problems in Writing Histories of Design[J]. Design Issues,2019,35(1):36-51.
[38] LAMBERT I,SPEED C.Making as Growth:Narratives in Materials and Process[J]. Design Issues,2017,33(3):104-109.
[39] WU Y Y,ACHARYA K.Breaching-through-Service:Accounting and Shaping Social Order with Service Design[J]. Design Issues,2024,40(4):54-66.
[40] HARDER M K,BURFORD G,HOOVER E.What Is Participation?Design Leads the Way to a Cross-Disciplinary Framework[J]. Design Issues,2013,29(4):41-57.
[41] EASTERDAY M W,GERBER E M,REES LEWIS D G. Social Innovation Networks:A New Approach to Social Design Education and Impact[J]. Design Issues,2018,34(2):64-76.