Based on the theories related to the renewal of industrial heritage buildings, the work aims to classify and quantify the multi-cultural factors of industrial heritage resources and integrate innovative thinking methods to construct cultural and creative product design generation approaches with industrial heritage characteristics and satisfaction evaluation methods. Firstly, a word-frequency analysis of the preserved industrial elements in the industrial heritage regeneration case is conducted. Secondly, by combining architectural typology and the concept of elements, the Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to construct a hierarchical model based on the five characteristics of architectural elements, interior elements, production equipment, production products, and signage texts. Thirdly, with Ansteel as an example, three simulation methods including form, structure, and function, are applied to select prototype characteristic factors and generate cultural and creative product solutions. Finally, satisfaction levels of the solutions are compared and evaluated with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. The process of generating cultural and creative product solutions and the comparative analysis of satisfaction show that the prototype structure model of the innovative thinking simulation method combined with the Analytic Hierarchy Process can effectively guide the hierarchical structure model of cultural and creative product solutions for the characteristics of Liaoning industrial heritage. The innovative thinking simulation and the Analytic Hierarchy Process can effectively guide the design of cultural and creative solutions with typical industrial heritage characteristics.
Key words
Analytic Hierarchy Process /
industrial heritage /
cultural and creative design /
simulation method /
design evaluation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 乔治,范文鹭,马军. 共生视角下的工业遗产文化传承及创意系列化设计[J]. 包装工程,2019,40(8):141-150.
[2] CHO M,SHIN S.Conservation or Economization?Industrial Heritage Conservation in Incheon,Korea[J]. Habitat International,2014,41:69-76.
[3] 张东,张建涛. 形态分区视角下的工业遗产价值的分析与判断——以郑煤机生产区为例[J]. 城市建筑,2019,16(34):82-85.
[4] LUO S J, DONG Y N.Classifying Cultural Artifacts Knowledge for Creative Design[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2017, 51(1): 113-123.
[5] 乔治,张新平. 基于文献计量分析的国际工业遗产研究态势解析[J]. 包装工程,2021,42(8):93-101.
[6] 张敏,刘林,熊志勇. 情景故事法在产品文化意象设计中的应用[J]. 包装工程,2016,37(22):164-168.
[7] 刘子建,徐倩倩. 基于打散重构原理的文化创意产品设计方法[J]. 包装工程,2017,38(20):156-162.
[8] 孟祥斌,孙苏榕. 融合语义学的产品概念设计过程模型研究[J]. 机械设计,2017,34(2):110-114.
[9] 赵淑华,张力丽. 博物馆文创产品叙事性设计方法[J]. 美术大观,2016(5):102-103.
[10] NAGAMACHI M.Kansei Engineering as a Powerful Consumer-Oriented Technology for Product Development[J]. Applied Ergonomics,2002,33(3):289-294.
[11] 杨静. 基于QFD与TRIZ的陕西唐文化旅游纪念品创新设计[J]. 包装工程,2017,38(14):203-207.
[12] 葛畅. 文创产品设计过程中的需求分析及转化[J]. 装饰,2018(2):142-143.
[13] 高阳,王沙,郑仁华,等. 工业遗产题材的文创旅游纪念品设计[J]. 包装工程,2019,40(18):264-268.
[14] 汤佳,刘文洁. 模拟法在建筑设计中的应用方法研究[J]. 现代装饰(理论),2016(7):87.
[15] 易军. 长沙窑事物原型获取与数字化表征[D]. 长沙:湖南大学,2014.
[16] 张歆. 地域文化视角下的文创产品创新设计策略[J]. 设计,2018,31(19):54-56.
[17] LI X,LIN B F.The Development and Design of Artificial Intelligence in Cultural and Creative Products[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2021,2021:9942277.
[18] 柴敏,马彧. 基于AHP和加权灰色关联分析的并条机设计评价研究[J]. 包装工程,2022,43(4):251-257.
[19] 《当代中国》丛书编辑部. 当代中国的辽宁[M]. 北京:当代中国出版社,1994:78-110.
[20] 程辉,邱筱,刘炳建,等. 国内文创产品设计方法研究综述——基于对《包装工程》所刊发的文创产品设计主题论文的分析[J]. 包装工程,2022,43(12):339-347.
[21] YUN Z Y.Application Research of Chinese Traditional Pattern Design in Cultural and Creative Products[J]. Frontiers in Art Research, 2020, 2(7): 50-54.
PDF(3133 KB)
