针对灾害应急与公共安全领域中风险情绪干预缺乏系统化设计路径的问题,以情绪双阶段特征为核心,构建风险情绪设计干预框架。基于风险感知与情绪调节理论构建基础框架,分析恐惧情绪的双阶段演化路径,从信息设计、环境线索与具身认知三个维度构建干预路径框架,通过工业安全与医疗领域典型案例论证,形成“有效预警-焦虑脱出”的风险情绪双调节通路。构建风险情绪的警觉与焦虑阶段的干预目标,提出信息设计、环境线索与具身认知的风险情绪调节协同机制,通过设计干预实现警觉激活与焦虑缓释的可控平衡。通过引入恐惧情绪双阶段特征,整合信息设计、环境线索与具身认知三维路径,提出“有效预警-焦虑脱出”的双极调节机制,将情绪机制工程化为可设计的调控对象,为公共灾害、工业安全等高风险场景提供可实施的跨学科设计干预方法论。
Abstract
To address the lack of a systematic design pathway for risk emotion intervention in disaster response and public safety, this study takes the two-stage characteristics of the fear emotion as the core to construct an operable design intervention framework for risk emotions. Based on risk perception and emotion regulation theories, a theoretical framework is established to analyze the two-stage evolutionary path of fear. An intervention pathway framework is constructed from three dimensions of information design, environmental cues, and embodied cognition. Through verification with typical cases in industrial safety and medical fields, a dual-regulation pathway of "effective warning - anxiety relief" for risk emotions is developed. The study defines intervention objectives for the alert and anxiety stages of risk emotions, and proposes a synergistic mechanism through which the three pathways regulate risk emotions. By means of design intervention, a controllable balance is achieved between activating necessary alertness and avoiding excessive anxiety. By introducing the two-stage characteristics of the fear emotion, integrating the three-dimensional pathways of information design, environmental cues, and embodied cognition, and proposing the bipolar regulation mechanism, this study transforms emotional mechanisms into designable regulatory targets, thereby providing an implementable interdisciplinary design intervention methodology for high-risk scenarios such as public disasters and industrial safety.
关键词
风险感知 /
情绪调节 /
设计干预 /
风险信息设计 /
路径分析
Key words
risk perception /
emotion regulation /
design intervention /
risk information design /
pathway analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] UNDRR. Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction: About the Sendai Framework[EB/OL]. (2025-06-01)[2025-12-02]. https://www.undrr.org/implementing-sendai-framework/what-sendai-framework
[2] CERNA-TUROFF I,CASEY J A,KEYES K,et al.Longitudinal Patterns of Natural Hazard Exposures and Anxiety and Depression Symptoms among Young Adults in Four Low- and Middle-Income Countries[J]. Scientific Reports,2024,14:10538.
[3] KOZLOWSKA K,WALKER P,MCLEAN L,et al.Fear and the Defense Cascade:Clinical Implications and Management[J]. Harvard Review of Psychiatry,2015,23(4):263-287.
[4] 王云峰,丁晓茜. 地震灾害后频繁余震对群众心理应激情绪影响建模分析[J]. 灾害学,2020,35(1):167-171.
[5] HAO Y Y,TAN H,OUYANG R L.How Warning Content and Persuasive Strategy Influence Risk Perception in Remote Fire Monitoring:An Empirical Study[J]. Displays,2025,90:103140.
[6] HAO Y Y,WANG Y Q.The Effects of Warning Design Features on Risk Perception and Performance in Remote Emergency Response[J]. Scientific Reports,2025,15:25201.
[7] MIRZA M,CLARK A,LUKOSCH S,et al.Risk Perception and Awareness in an Augmented Reality Flood Response Game:The Role of Player Perspectives[J]. Computers in Human Behavior Reports,2025,18:100657.
[8] PAEK H J, HOVE T.Mechanisms of Climate Change Media Effects: Roles of Risk Perception, Negative Emotion, and Efficacy Beliefs[J]. Health Communication, 2024, 39(13): 3426-3435.
[9] Kolekar S, de Winter J, Abbink D. Human-Like Driving Behaviour Emerges from a Risk-Based Driver Model[J]. Nature Communication, 2020, 11(1): 4850.
[8] PAEK H J,HOVE T.Mechanisms of Climate Change Media Effects:Roles of Risk Perception,Negative Emotion,and Efficacy Beliefs[J]. Health Communication,2024,39(13):3426-3435.
[10] 朱苇苇,唐莉,魏玖长,等. 公众的邻避设施风险感知及影响因素研究——以核电站为例[J]. 风险灾害危机研究,2017(2):67-85.
[11] 王粟雅. 愤怒和恐惧如何影响驾驶风险感知[J]. 山西青年,2018(4):229.
[12] 董文丽,张馨云,沐守宽. 新冠感染恐惧对公众心理困扰的影响:风险感知的中介作用[J]. 心理学通讯,2023,6(1):3-8.
[13] 陈梁,谭心莹,雷凌雯. 基于说服信息设计的风险干预:理论与实证研究的发展[J]. 装饰,2022(8):40-46.
[14] XU L,OU S Y,ZHENG X F,et al.The Impact of State Anxiety on Fear Generalization[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2016,48(12):1507.
[15] HMAN A.Fear and Anxiety[J]. Handbook of emotions, 2008: 709-729.
[16] 胡垛垛,何吉波,雍琳. 威胁诉求对驾驶安全的影响:有效与无效[J]. 包装工程,2023,44(2):62-68.
[17] 牛亚峰,吴梦丽,屈梦原,等. 战斗机追踪任务中听觉告警信息呈现对注意力的影响研究[J]. 航空科学技术,2023,34(11):125-134.
[18] 牛佳然,吴晓莉,张蓝,等. 基于视觉认知特性的作战显控界面信息结构布局研究[J]. 包装工程,2023,44(22):328-337.
[19] 赵新宇,韩挺. 驾驶情绪信息驱动的车机HMI设计[J]. 设计,2022,35(14):40.
[20] 王琳,姚飞飞. 健康类App信息可视化设计对用户网络健康焦虑影响的实证研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2023,46(9):87-94.
基金
2024年度国家社科基金艺术学重大项目阶段性成果（24ZD16）
PDF(7925 KB)
渝公网安备50010702505643 渝ICP备15012534号-8
